In February, the customer of a Mid-Atlantic-based Microsoft solution provider received a cold call from a person in Costa Rica referring to herself as a Microsoft “solutions consultant” who wanted to discuss the customer’s upcoming cloud subscription renewal.
But if that wasn’t bad enough in the partner’s view, after talking to the customer, the solutions consultant sent a low-quality lead through the Microsoft Partner Center portal to the existing Mid-Atlantic Microsoft partner, who wished to remain anonymous.
“The lead that they submitted had less licenses than the client has now,” the Mid-Atlantic partner said in an interview. “Plus, they have no idea that the client has backups and other services with other providers. It’s insane.”
The partner said that their client was angered by the whole experience, finding it a waste of time. “This is not acceptable and is not working the way that they (Microsoft) think it is,” the partner said.
The solution provider said that Microsoft is also doing damage to his trusted adviser role by recommending higher-tier Microsoft 365 licenses like E5 to customers when those licenses go well beyond what the customer needs.
“Business Premium is a great solution for them,” he said. “If they don’t need it [E5], why sell it to them?”
Multiple Microsoft solution providers have mentioned a recent wave of phone calls, emails and even unsolicited calendar invites to their customers by Microsoft contractors without prior notice to partners. These emails from contractors date back to December 2024.
Partners characterise the contractors’ full-court press on cloud renewals as “way more aggressive” than they have seen in the past from Microsoft to get customers to adopt higher-tier licenses and a broader range of Microsoft products.
Partners said these communications—which, they say, violate the primary tenant of channel sales that a vendor should not go behind a partner’s back to sell to an established customer—jeopardise their role as trusted advisers.
The current wave of activity by these Microsoft contractors—also known as “solutions consultants,” “international suppliers” and “V dash” contractors because of the “v-” naming convention that goes ahead of the username in their Microsoft.com email addresses—is meant to help partners with cross-selling and up-selling Microsoft products and services, especially in the SMB space, people familiar with the operation have said.
The Mid-Atlantic solution provider is one of five partners to talk about the calls and emails to their customers from Microsoft contractors without partners’ prior knowledge based on upcoming end-of-sale or renewal dates.
Four Microsoft solution providers said that they are furious about the outreach to their customers and the sellers’ methods, but that they wished to remain anonymous to preserve their relationship with the software giant.
In an email response, a Microsoft spokesperson said that the communications are related to the Redmond, Wash.-based tech giant’s Vendor Digital Sales team. The VDS team “identifies up-sell and cross-sell opportunities with small and medium businesses, connects those opportunities to partners, prioritising the customer’s preferred partner, and develops them jointly through a consultative approach.”
“Quoting, billing, and implementation are all done by the partner,” the spokesperson said. “The program, which has been in existence for more than five years, provides technical expertise at no cost to help partners increase win rates and maximise deal sizes.”
People close to VDS have said that the program is global and meant to work similar to a pre-sales customer-facing engine, providing demonstrations, cloud and security evaluations, and more. VDS also receives referrals from solution providers through Partner Center and passes upwards of hundreds of thousands of leads to partners worldwide.
One person close to VDS denied that there has been a ramp-up in activity from the group.
A Microsoft solution provider in the Southeastern U.S. said that a VDS seller called their customer late last year and disrupted their attempts to sell Copilot. The customer, who was historically conservative with adopting new technology, had already agreed to pilot the AI tool with a small user pool and to a timeline for progress assessments.
After learning of the VDS contact, the solution provider fought to be on the call and described it as a high-pressure, quota-driven sale to persuade the customer to buy more seats.
“That’s not the right thing for the customer right now,” the solution provider said. “This shift in Microsoft’s approach seems to prioritise short-term results over sustained partnerships.”
The Southeastern Microsoft solution provider also did not like the VDS seller referring the customer to Microsoft’s “expert technology consultants.” The solution provider believes that these Microsoft ETCs could take away from the partner’s own consulting engagements.
“The margins aren’t high enough with Microsoft to deal with unhappy customers,” the provider said.
A Microsoft solution provider in the Northeast said that a VDS seller kept sending meeting invitations to a customer without explanation.
“That was just ridiculous,” he said. “You’re just pissing off the customer.”
When the solution provider talked to their Microsoft partner development manager, the PDM didn’t know anything about VDS, the solution provider said.
Multiple Microsoft solution providers also said they are concerned that VDS sellers are using calls and emails to introduce customers to new ISVs that the partner hasn’t vetted.
For example, multiple VDS sellers recommended to Microsoft customers a Toronto-based ISV called Block 64, which provides an IT discovery and insights platform.
The company’s website lists among its vendor partners Microsoft and Amazon Web Services. Its solution provider partners include CRN 2024 Solution Provider 500 honourees SoftwareOne, Zones, SHI, Insight and Connection.
Block 64 CEO James Corless said in an email that he is “not surprised that we are mentioned by Microsoft suppliers; in fact I am encouraged to hear that Block 64 is being mentioned more often.”
The ISV has worked with Microsoft in multiple global regions and various programs since about 2018, Corless said. Block 64 doesn’t have an agreement with VDS, but it provides their teams with “ongoing training and technical support on behalf of Microsoft,” Corless said.
Block 64 isn’t a Microsoft Cloud Solution Provider and doesn’t compete with CSP partners, he said. The company was founded in 2012, has System and Organisation Controls Type II (SOC 2)-certified offers and is in more than 20,000 end customer environments in 80 countries, Corless said.
“Block 64 is licensed by many CSPs for use in the delivery of their own [IT asset management/software asset management], cloud migration and security services,” he said. “We extend CSPs’ capabilities in these areas. … This initiative should be viewed as an opportunity for CSPs, as many of our recommendations result in new opportunities for CSPs to provide additional services to their existing customers.”
Addressing specific concerns by Microsoft solution providers angered with the VDS program, a person close to the program said that VDS is not meant to take away partner engagements and VDS sellers do not have the ability to transact with customers.
Their inability to transact with customers comes across in some of the VDS emails reviewed, where VDS sellers tell customers to make final subscription renewals with their solution provider. VDS sellers also should not contact month-to-month subscription customers on a monthly basis, the person said.
VDS sellers go directly to customers because many customers work with multiple partners managing various Microsoft products and services, the person said. This allows the VDS team to confirm with the customer which partner they want to work with if they further engage VDS.
For customers and solution providers especially wary of unsolicited calls and emails coming from scammers, they can use Microsoft tools to verify the VDS seller does indeed work on behalf of Microsoft. The sellers are also not auditing customer licenses, a practice that stopped years ago, said the person close to the program.
VDS contacts customers not only on cloud renewals, but also for Enterprise Agreements (EAs) as well, the person said.
Over the past two years, VDS has tried to gain more visibility with solution providers and distributors and spread more awareness of its capabilities, the person said. But the person acknowledged that some partners still might not know about the program.
People familiar with the VDS program said they expect Microsoft to keep investing in the program. The VDS program played a big role in the rollout of Microsoft’s Copilot offers that launched in January 2024, as an example.
People close to the program also said that multiple partners have shared positive feedback on the program.
One West Coast Microsoft partner who asked for anonymity to share emails VDS sellers sent to end users said that he believes the customer contacts are helpful.
These contacts directly from the vendor could motivate customers to actually upgrade their subscription if they’ve been resistant to partner recommendations.
“It’s a huge issue that partners get upset at this stuff,” he said. “See the positive. Without Microsoft, many customers wouldn’t do anything.”
Titiwoot Weerawong via Vecteezy
"*" indicates required fields
Software Asset Management is a business practice that involves managing and optimising the life cycle of software within an organisation.
Software asset management is relevant to many facets of a business - take a look at some of the roles that it can form part of the focus of.
Software vendors come in all shape and sizes - all with their own set of licensing models and rules. We take a look at just a few of them.
As a constantly evolving subject, SAM is not without its challenges. We take a look at some of the most common ones.
Wondering what an investment in SAM could do for your business? Fill out a few details and find out what return you could get!
Answer a few questions about your SAM infrastructure & experience, and we'll put together a personalised recommendation for the future.
A simple health check of what's being used across your Office 365 estate in this FREE, Microsoft backed and easy to setup review.
Just like you would with your vehicle each year, get an annual check up of your software asset management programme.
Overwhelmed by the task of documenting the steps for a successful SAM programme? Get the experts in to help!
Concerned your SAM tools aren't covering your whole estate? Or on the look out for an entirely new tool? Get us in to assist.
Not content with covering all things SAM related, we've teamed up with Capital to provide a comprehensive hardware asset management review.
A simple, one-time reconciliation of the software you have deployed versus the licence entitlement you own.
A regularly scheduled analysis of your organisation's estate, specifically adapted to your needs and budget.
A full appraisal of your Microsoft 365 setup and how best to optimise it through automated recommendations.
An add-on to our SAMplicity One, MOT and Plus offerings, quickly diagnose your ability to migrate your resources to the cloud.
In collaboration with law firm Addleshaw Goddard, ensure the legality of your SAM programme and get assistance with any contract disputes.
Available as standard with SAMplicity Plus, ensure you're compliant if you're unexpectedly audited by a vendor.
We've teamed up with some of the forefront experts in licensing knowledge so you can teach yourself to be an expert too.
Stumped by the continually evolving complexities of SAM? Join us for one of our comprehensive courses, either in-person or online.
It’s chock full of useful advice, exclusive events and interesting articles. Don’t miss out!