Last week, Amazon shouted from the rooftops that its customers are finally allowed to use Microsoft 365 from AWS WorkSpaces.
At the risk of looking a gift horse in the mouth, this is a stunning reversal of a licensing limitation that Microsoft has had in place since October of 2019. The limitation was seemingly put in place to restrict Office 365 usage at key competitors, but it has yet to be publicly challenged.
Per Microsoft’s announcement:
Beginning August 1, 2023, users with specific licenses may run Microsoft 365 Apps for enterprise/business, Microsoft Project, and Microsoft Visio on Amazon WorkSpaces. The licenses that will be eligible under this revised policy include Microsoft 365 E3/E5/A3/A5 and Microsoft 365 Business Premium. If you currently have any of these licenses, starting from August 1, you will be able to utilize these Microsoft applications on Amazon WorkSpaces virtual desktop infrastructure.
With this announcement, Microsoft lifted a very specific part of a broader set of limitations that has served as a point of frustration for vendors and customers alike.
In August 2019, Microsoft stated that on October 1, 2019:
As usual, Microsoft licensing interpretation is in the eye of the beholder, and if you ask 10 different people a Microsoft licensing question, you will get 11 different answers. However, here is some unambiguous language that specifically excludes Listed Providers from being able to provide Office or Windows. Those Listed Providers, in a document maintained by Microsoft and dated October 2019, are as follows:
There is also a note that says any service running on a Listed Provider is also subject to this policy, and it specifically cites VMware Cloud on AWS as an example. Effectively, it meant that the only way to run Office 365 was either on premises, from a cloud that’s not a Listed Provider or — and this is where the eyebrows start to rise — on Azure Virtual Desktop. This final option involves a different licensing path that’s not affected by this policy.
It seems counterintuitive that Microsoft should be on the list of excluded providers. My only possible explanation is that, by placing themselves on the list at the same time as creating another way to use Office 365 from the cloud — via Azure Virtual Desktop — that customers get as part of an enterprise agreement, Microsoft can say, “We excluded ourselves, too,” while at the same time onboarding people into their new ecosystem.
This policy, and the caveat that any services running on a Listed Provider were also affected, means that other services, such as Azure VMware Solution — which is effectively vSphere as a service, delivered by Microsoft — are also not able to run Office 365 or Windows desktop OSes. That is, they aren’t able to run without paying the license mobility fee, which is effectively just a VDA license in addition to your E3/E5 license.
Despite Microsoft being on the list, they still created a path that makes Azure Virtual Desktop the only place to go for customers who want to use Windows desktop operating systems, Windows multi-session and Office 365.
Microsoft appears to have walked back one very specific angle of its licensing policies: AWS WorkSpaces seems to have been carved out of the Listed Providers. What that means for the other Listed Providers remains to be seen, including non-WorkSpaces AWS workloads. For example, what does that mean for VMware and Citrix environments that want to run on VMware Cloud on AWS?
It does appear that software using WorkSpaces Core is included in this, which could be great news for partners such as Leostream, VMware, and Workspot that are working with AWS today.
It’s also worth noting that all the other licensing stipulations are still in effect with AWS and Microsoft. Windows Server instances can run on shared hardware with licensing built into the AWS WorkSpaces subscription cost, while Windows desktop OSes are bring your own license (BYOL) and must run on dedicated hardware.
This is a huge deal, for sure. But now it seems as though Microsoft is picking and choosing who it works with and who it doesn’t. To me, the real question is, “Why did they make that change? And why now?”
Could the heat have been on? Google and AWS, as well as independent groups like the Coalition for Fair Software Licensing, are attempting to shine a light on unfair practices across the industry, and it may be gaining traction among themselves and customers. One guess is that Microsoft’s hand was forced by some large customers, perhaps under the threat of a lawsuit that could force Microsoft to explain these license policies in a way that didn’t make them seem anti-competitive.
From intel based on industry conversations, the other Listed Providers are still playing by the old rules, though that could change. Perhaps the number of disenfranchised customers hasn’t hit a critical mass to force a broader change. But the other companies listed — or a partner of theirs like VMware — should be waving their hands wildly, asking when each of their platforms and customers are next. It’s also worth noting that this announcement does nothing to provide relief for customers that are paying for Windows VDA licenses when running desktops in Listed Providers and not in Azure Virtual Desktop.
Nevertheless, the key takeaway: This is a good thing for AWS and AWS WorkSpaces customers, and it levels the competitive landscape a tiny bit. There is a long way to go, but it gives hope that things may open up a bit more in the future.
Microsoft | Amazon
"*" indicates required fields
Software Asset Management is a business practice that involves managing and optimising the life cycle of software within an organisation.
Software asset management is relevant to many facets of a business - take a look at some of the roles that it can form part of the focus of.
Software vendors come in all shape and sizes - all with their own set of licensing models and rules. We take a look at just a few of them.
As a constantly evolving subject, SAM is not without its challenges. We take a look at some of the most common ones.
Wondering what an investment in SAM could do for your business? Fill out a few details and find out what return you could get!
Answer a few questions about your SAM infrastructure & experience, and we'll put together a personalised recommendation for the future.
A simple health check of what's being used across your Office 365 estate in this FREE, Microsoft backed and easy to setup review.
Just like you would with your vehicle each year, get an annual check up of your software asset management programme.
Overwhelmed by the task of documenting the steps for a successful SAM programme? Get the experts in to help!
Concerned your SAM tools aren't covering your whole estate? Or on the look out for an entirely new tool? Get us in to assist.
Not content with covering all things SAM related, we've teamed up with Capital to provide a comprehensive hardware asset management review.
A simple, one-time reconciliation of the software you have deployed versus the licence entitlement you own.
A regularly scheduled analysis of your organisation's estate, specifically adapted to your needs and budget.
A full appraisal of your Microsoft 365 setup and how best to optimise it through automated recommendations.
An add-on to our SAMplicity One, MOT and Plus offerings, quickly diagnose your ability to migrate your resources to the cloud.
In collaboration with law firm Addleshaw Goddard, ensure the legality of your SAM programme and get assistance with any contract disputes.
Available as standard with SAMplicity Plus, ensure you're compliant if you're unexpectedly audited by a vendor.
We've teamed up with some of the forefront experts in licensing knowledge so you can teach yourself to be an expert too.
Stumped by the continually evolving complexities of SAM? Join us for one of our comprehensive courses, either in-person or online.
It’s chock full of useful advice, exclusive events and interesting articles. Don’t miss out!