The landscape of data center infrastructure is shifting dramatically, influenced by recent licensing changes from Broadcom that are driving up costs and prompting enterprises to reevaluate their virtualization strategies. A new trend — devirtualization, a process of migrating workloads from virtual to physical environments — is taking shape as a response to these changes, according to Gartner’s 2024 Hype Cycle for Data Center Infrastructure Technologies report.
“On-premises virtualized large complex workloads with more marginal consolidation benefits are being considered to rehost on physical servers or devirtualize,” Gartner said in the report. “Clients are seeing increased costs with on-premises virtualization with Broadcom’s acquisition of VMware. Costs are not the only factor alongside service levels, based on resilience, availability and portability of the workloads.”
According to Gartner, Broadcom’s new licensing models, which transition from enterprise license agreements to more complex consumption models, can force businesses to pay 2-3 times more. This substantial cost hike is particularly challenging for large workloads that do not benefit from the density increases and cost savings associated with consolidating smaller workloads.
The high cost would make it difficult for some enterprises to justify maintaining their current virtualized environments.
So, what exactly did Broadcom do that triggered the price rise?
After the acquisition of VMWare, Broadcom merged many VMware products into two main offerings: VMware Cloud Foundation and VMware vSphere Foundation. Some components have been integrated into these two solutions or eliminated entirely, such as the old VMware End-User Computing (EUC), now called Omnissa. As a result, VMware customers can no longer purchase perpetual licenses or just the ESXi hypervisor on its own.
These changes have made it more expensive for companies to run virtual machines, particularly for demanding tasks. As a result, some companies are considering a surprising move: ditching virtual machines altogether and going back to using physical computers for specific workloads. This approach, called “devirtualization,” can offer cost savings but comes with the added complexity of managing physical hardware.
As per Gartner, another factor that is driving this trend is that large workloads running on dedicated VM hosts do not benefit from the same density increases and cost savings as consolidating small workloads.
“This highlights large dedicated workloads as potential cases for devirtualization,” Gartner added in the report.
Devirtualization, while currently applicable to only about one percent of organizations, is seen as a potential long-term solution despite its complexities, Gartner said in the Hype Cycle 2024 report.
Devirtualization is moving a workload or application from a hypervisor-based virtualized host to a physical host consisting of server hardware, operating system, and management tools.
Gartner anticipates that it could take five to ten years for devirtualization to reach widespread adoption and achieve the “plateau of productivity” where the technology becomes mature and widely accepted.
However, Gartner said, it has its own set of challenges and can have varied business impacts.
“As workloads devirtualize and move to physical hardware, the portability functions need replacing in the bare metal physical world of devirtualization,” Gartner said in the report. “This requires investment in high value and high cost replacement functions and buy-in from the business.”
Besides, going back to physical with devirtualization results in the “need to invest in complex and costly infrastructure such as OS or DBMS clusters” to replace the resilience functionality of live migration and host-based recovery.
While large or dedicated server VMs are more marginal workloads to virtualize and good contenders for devirtualization, Gartner said, it is not as easy to look at the impact of replacing live migration and host-based recovery on devirtualized physical workloads.
In addition to devirtualization, the report also points to the rise of “revirtualization” or virtual-to-virtual migrations as another potential solution, which is about moving from VMWare to another hypervisor vendor.
Again, VMWare licensing changes have been attributed to this trend by Gartner.
“With significant changes in VMware licensing, many organizations are considering an alternate hypervisor built on open-source or alternate technologies,” Gartner said in the report. “Clients are also looking at ways of defining the scope of managing enterprise agreements using virtualization vendors as they move to subscription models.”
This trend is driven by organizations seeking to mitigate technical deficiencies or address commercial risks introduced by incumbent providers moving to subscription models.
Revirtualization is typically undertaken to overcome a technical deficiency or to address a viability or commercial risk, the report mentioned.
Gartner warns that while revirtualization might help reduce exposure to increased audit and contractual issues, it can also increase the total cost of ownership and introduce new operational challenges.
While devirtualization is at its “embryonic” stage with about one percent of organizational penetration, Gartner said revirtualization is a bit mature with about five to twenty percent of enterprises already adopting it.
These trends underscore the dynamic nature of data center technologies and the critical decisions enterprises must make to stay competitive and efficient in a rapidly changing environment.
Cliff Hang via Pixabay
"*" indicates required fields
Software Asset Management is a business practice that involves managing and optimising the life cycle of software within an organisation.
Software asset management is relevant to many facets of a business - take a look at some of the roles that it can form part of the focus of.
Software vendors come in all shape and sizes - all with their own set of licensing models and rules. We take a look at just a few of them.
As a constantly evolving subject, SAM is not without its challenges. We take a look at some of the most common ones.
Wondering what an investment in SAM could do for your business? Fill out a few details and find out what return you could get!
Answer a few questions about your SAM infrastructure & experience, and we'll put together a personalised recommendation for the future.
A simple health check of what's being used across your Office 365 estate in this FREE, Microsoft backed and easy to setup review.
Just like you would with your vehicle each year, get an annual check up of your software asset management programme.
Overwhelmed by the task of documenting the steps for a successful SAM programme? Get the experts in to help!
Concerned your SAM tools aren't covering your whole estate? Or on the look out for an entirely new tool? Get us in to assist.
Not content with covering all things SAM related, we've teamed up with Capital to provide a comprehensive hardware asset management review.
A simple, one-time reconciliation of the software you have deployed versus the licence entitlement you own.
A regularly scheduled analysis of your organisation's estate, specifically adapted to your needs and budget.
A full appraisal of your Microsoft 365 setup and how best to optimise it through automated recommendations.
An add-on to our SAMplicity One, MOT and Plus offerings, quickly diagnose your ability to migrate your resources to the cloud.
In collaboration with law firm Addleshaw Goddard, ensure the legality of your SAM programme and get assistance with any contract disputes.
Available as standard with SAMplicity Plus, ensure you're compliant if you're unexpectedly audited by a vendor.
We've teamed up with some of the forefront experts in licensing knowledge so you can teach yourself to be an expert too.
Stumped by the continually evolving complexities of SAM? Join us for one of our comprehensive courses, either in-person or online.
It’s chock full of useful advice, exclusive events and interesting articles. Don’t miss out!