In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and business, a provocative thesis is gaining traction: the Software as a Service (SaaS) era may be coming to an end. This bold claim was made by Sam Lessin, a GP in Slow Ventures, in a recent Tweet which challenges the long-held belief that SaaS represented the pinnacle of software business models. Reddit threads indicating the decline of SaaS sales have been popping up and discussions on VC LinkedIn and blogs posts are only confirming the fears: the SaaS dream may be over.
For over a decade, SaaS has been hailed as the holy grail of software business models. The promise of recurring revenue, scalability, and high customer lifetime values (LTVs) attracted entrepreneurs and investors alike. However, industry insiders are now questioning whether this model has lived up to its lofty expectations.
One of the primary criticisms leveled against SaaS is the misconception of infinite LTVs. The idea that once a customer is acquired, they will continue to pay indefinitely, has proven to be overly optimistic. In reality, businesses face continuous pricing pressures and competitive threats, making customer retention an ongoing challenge rather than a given.
Another factor contributing to the potential decline of SaaS is the increasing commoditization of software. With the advent of artificial intelligence and more accessible development tools, creating sophisticated software solutions has become easier than ever before. This democratization of software development has led to a proliferation of options for businesses, driving down prices and reducing the perceived value of individual SaaS offerings.
As a result, software code itself is depreciating in value. What was once a significant barrier to entry and a source of competitive advantage is now often seen as a replaceable commodity. This shift has profound implications for how software companies position themselves and create value for their customers.
Despite its theoretical appeal, selling SaaS solutions has proven to be more challenging than many anticipated. The often-touted Product-Led Growth (PLG) strategy, which relies on the product itself to drive customer acquisition and expansion, has not been universally successful. Even for companies with impressive software and potentially margin-expanding stories, closing deals remains difficult without a clear and compelling value proposition.
Moreover, the revenue generated from SaaS sales often falls short of the value created for customers. This misalignment between value delivery and value capture presents a significant challenge for SaaS companies seeking sustainable growth and profitability.
While the traditional SaaS model may be losing its lustre, software itself remains a critical component of modern business operations. The key shift is in how companies think about and utilize software. Rather than viewing it as a standalone business model, forward-thinking entrepreneurs and executives are beginning to see software as a powerful tool for creating value in other business contexts.
Instead of focusing solely on selling software subscriptions, innovative companies are using software to enhance and transform existing businesses. The goal is to leverage technology to make certain businesses significantly more valuable, efficient, and competitive.
This approach involves developing software that can improve the operations of “real world” businesses by 20-30% or more. By creating such powerful tools, technology companies can position themselves to acquire or partner with the businesses they’ve enhanced, thereby capturing a larger share of the value they’ve created.
A recent example that illustrates this shifting paradigm is Klarna, the buy-now-pay-later giant. In a move that has stirred both interest and skepticism in the tech world, Klarna announced plans to “shut down SaaS providers” and replace them with internally built AI solutions. The company has already severed ties with major enterprise software providers like Salesforce and Workday, opting instead to develop its own applications, likely built on OpenAI’s infrastructure.
Klarna’s CEO, Sebastian Siemiatkowski, framed this decision as part of a broader strategy to consolidate and streamline operations through AI, standardization, and simplification. The company claims that its AI-powered customer service assistant, launched in collaboration with OpenAI, has already performed the work of 700 human agents and handled millions of interactions.
However, this bold move has been met with skepticism from industry experts. HR technology analyst Josh Bersin pointed out the complexity of replacing systems like Workday, which have “decades of workflows and complex data structures built in.” Others in the tech community question whether building these systems in-house is the best use of capital, especially for a company without plans to sell the resulting software solutions.
Klarna’s strategy aligns with the idea of using software as a transformative tool rather than a product. By developing its own AI-powered systems, the company aims to enhance its core business operations and potentially reduce costs. However, the success of this approach remains to be seen, and it highlights the challenges and risks associated with such a radical shift away from established SaaS providers.
This case study underscores the broader trend of companies reevaluating their relationship with software and exploring ways to leverage AI and custom solutions to gain a competitive edge. Whether Klarna’s gambit proves successful could have far-reaching implications for how other businesses approach their software strategies in the future.
Proponents of this new approach argue that while others will eventually catch up in terms of software capabilities, the first-movers will have already used their technological edge to acquire valuable real-world assets. These assets – be they retail stores, manufacturing plants, or service businesses – represent tangible, scarce resources that retain value even as the software that enhances them becomes commoditized.
In essence, this strategy flips the script on the traditional tech company playbook. Instead of building a software business that can be easily replicated or made obsolete, companies are using their technological prowess to accumulate a portfolio of improved, efficient real-world businesses and assets.
While this new paradigm presents exciting opportunities, it’s not without its challenges. Companies pursuing this strategy will need to develop expertise in industries far removed from software development. They’ll need to navigate complex regulatory environments, manage physical assets, and deal with the day-to-day realities of running diverse business operations.
Moreover, this approach requires significant capital and a long-term vision. The payoff may not be as immediate as a successful SaaS launch, but proponents argue that the eventual rewards – ownership of improved, efficient businesses across multiple sectors – are worth the wait and investment.
As we look to the future, it’s clear that software will continue to play a crucial role in business success. However, its role may evolve from being the product itself to being the competitive advantage that allows companies to excel in various industries.
This shift doesn’t mean that all SaaS companies will disappear overnight. Many will continue to thrive, especially those providing essential services or operating in niche markets. However, for ambitious tech entrepreneurs and investors, the bigger opportunity may lie in using software as a means to an end rather than an end in itself.
The potential end of the SaaS era as we know it doesn’t signal the demise of software’s importance in business. Rather, it heralds a new age where software becomes an even more potent force – not as a standalone product, but as a transformative tool capable of reshaping entire industries.
As this paradigm shift unfolds, we can expect to see tech companies venturing far beyond their traditional boundaries, using their software expertise to become major players in a diverse array of sectors. The winners in this new landscape will likely be those who can most effectively leverage their technological capabilities to identify, improve, and ultimately own valuable real-world businesses and assets.
For entrepreneurs, investors, and business leaders, this evolving perspective on software’s role presents both challenges and opportunities. Those who can successfully navigate this shift may find themselves at the forefront of a new wave of value creation, where the lines between technology companies and traditional businesses blur, and where software serves as the ultimate competitive advantage across all sectors of the economy. Questions like compliance and security for AI replacement tools remain unsolved, but the threat remains real.
As we move forward, it will be fascinating to watch how this new approach unfolds and what it means for the future of business and technology. The SaaS era may be waning, but the era of software as a transformative business weapon is just beginning.
Ann H via Pexels
"*" indicates required fields
Software Asset Management is a business practice that involves managing and optimising the life cycle of software within an organisation.
Software asset management is relevant to many facets of a business - take a look at some of the roles that it can form part of the focus of.
Software vendors come in all shape and sizes - all with their own set of licensing models and rules. We take a look at just a few of them.
As a constantly evolving subject, SAM is not without its challenges. We take a look at some of the most common ones.
Wondering what an investment in SAM could do for your business? Fill out a few details and find out what return you could get!
Answer a few questions about your SAM infrastructure & experience, and we'll put together a personalised recommendation for the future.
A simple health check of what's being used across your Office 365 estate in this FREE, Microsoft backed and easy to setup review.
Just like you would with your vehicle each year, get an annual check up of your software asset management programme.
Overwhelmed by the task of documenting the steps for a successful SAM programme? Get the experts in to help!
Concerned your SAM tools aren't covering your whole estate? Or on the look out for an entirely new tool? Get us in to assist.
Not content with covering all things SAM related, we've teamed up with Capital to provide a comprehensive hardware asset management review.
A simple, one-time reconciliation of the software you have deployed versus the licence entitlement you own.
A regularly scheduled analysis of your organisation's estate, specifically adapted to your needs and budget.
A full appraisal of your Microsoft 365 setup and how best to optimise it through automated recommendations.
An add-on to our SAMplicity One, MOT and Plus offerings, quickly diagnose your ability to migrate your resources to the cloud.
In collaboration with law firm Addleshaw Goddard, ensure the legality of your SAM programme and get assistance with any contract disputes.
Available as standard with SAMplicity Plus, ensure you're compliant if you're unexpectedly audited by a vendor.
We've teamed up with some of the forefront experts in licensing knowledge so you can teach yourself to be an expert too.
Stumped by the continually evolving complexities of SAM? Join us for one of our comprehensive courses, either in-person or online.
It’s chock full of useful advice, exclusive events and interesting articles. Don’t miss out!