Zeiss Group abandons SAP cloud rebuild after costs blow past €200M

Zeiss Group abandons SAP cloud rebuild after costs blow past €200M

The German optics maker joins a long list of companies whose S/4HANA migrations have blown past their budget.

Published on 8th September 2026

Germany’s Zeiss Group, a key supplier to the global semiconductor industry, overhauled plans to move to a new cloud-based SAP SE software service after costs swelled to more than €200 million over several years.

The precision optics maker will now use a so-called brownfield approach, which means moving its existing software systems to the cloud, in order to save money, according to people familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified because the information isn’t public.

External consultancies are leading the transition, the people said. The initial attempts to build a new system from the ground up were more complicated than expected, they added.

The decision offers a window into the complexity and expense of cloud transformations, a process that will drive SAP’s growth through the end of the decade. Starting in 2020, SAP CEO Christian Klein has pushed customers to move from locally hosted enterprise software to a subscription-based online service, which is more lucrative for the company and currently accounts for more than 60% of revenue.

SAP is Europe’s largest software company and sells products to manage finances, supply chains and other core business functions. More than 90% of the Fortune 500 use its solutions. Moving to the cloud can be a complex process and many customers still haven’t completed the transition, even as SAP plans to end regular support for its legacy on-premise solutions by the end of next year.

Cloud migration projects often involve external partners such as Accenture, EY or PricewaterhouseCoopers and take years and millions of dollars to complete. Moving sensitive business data is a delicate operation and can cause critical disruptions if done poorly.

US medical tech company Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc sued Deloitte last year over a botched implementation of SAP’s cloud platform. The complaint alleges the process “was a disaster” and the result “was an overly customised software system riddled with defects and functionality gaps.” Zimmer paid US$94 million in fees, 36% more than Deloitte had represented, according to the complaint.

Deloitte is fighting Zimmer Biomet’s “meritless claim”, according to a company spokesperson. A spokesperson for Zimmer Biomet declined to comment.

Zeiss began planning its path to the cloud six years ago and has now reconfigured the migration of its enterprise resource planning, or ERP, software “to achieve faster progress”, a spokeswoman for the company said in a statement. She declined to comment on the investment or the project’s timeline.

A spokesperson for SAP declined to comment on customers’ projects.

Zeiss is the exclusive supplier of optics used in ASML Holding NV’s most sophisticated lithography machines, which make advanced semiconductors, including for Nvidia Corp. Based in the German city of Oberkochen, Zeiss is expanding its operations to meet booming demand from chipmakers, the head of its semiconductor division, Frank Rohmund, told Bloomberg last month.

Zeiss initially planned a greenfield approach, which would have meant building the company’s core IT functions from scratch in the cloud, according to the people. Such projects seek to get rid of needlessly complex legacy processes and streamline systems.

The company has now pivoted to a brownfield approach that will preserve many existing data systems, according to the Zeiss spokeswoman.

The cost of moving to the cloud is highly variable, according to Byron Ford, a consultant at the Berkeley Partnership who works on SAP migrations. Greenfield projects generally cost at least 20% more than brownfield ones but can be twice as expensive, depending on factors such as which geographies are moving, the number of systems involved and the client’s own resources, he said.

A greenfield migration of several systems in a single country might cost £35 million to £40 million and a global project twice that or more, Ford added.

Your migration project also SAP-ping your budgets?

As the article shows, you're not the only one if so. Let us know your story - especially if it's a hurdle you've managed to overcome.

Get in touch

Source

Image Credit

Tima Miroshnichenko via Pexels

The latest updates straight to your inbox

We just need a few details to get you subscribed

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Marketing Preferences*

Health Checks

Inventory & Compliance

Cloud Readiness & Optimisation

Agreement & Audit Support

Learning

Looking for something specific?

Let's see what we can find - just type in what you're after

Wait! Before you go

Have you signed up to our newsletter yet?

It’s chock full of useful advice, exclusive events and interesting articles. Don’t miss out!

Cookie Notice

Our website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience while you're here.